This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1078087408320237v1 44/2/218    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Simpson, D. Articles by Kelly, T. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The New Chicago School of Urbanism and the New Daley Machine

University of Illinois at Chicago

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dwg1998red{at}yahoo.com.

	Abstract

In the twentieth century, the "Chicago School" became a primary paradigm of urban studies. The demise of city machine governments, coupled with the changing settlement and business patterns, have rendered the "Old Chicago School" as outmoded but not irrelevant. Cities are multiracial metropolitan regions immersed in a global economy and are either not governed by machines or by radically different machines, even in Chicago. Nonetheless, similarities remain between the old machines and machine-like governance of today. The New Chicago School may be a template for global cities just as New York and Los Angeles provide models for others. This new school raises questions for scholars: (a) Is an autocratic mayor and a machine required to govern a twenty-first century city? (b) Will racial politics continue to be key? and (c) Can effective governance be created for a metropolitan region?

First published on July 22, 2008, doi:10.1177/1078087408320237

Urban Affairs Review 2008;44:218.

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?