This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1078087407309223v1 43/5/691    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bénit-Gbaffou, C. Articles by Morange, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Communities, the Private Sector, and the State: Contested Forms of Security Governance in Cape Town and Johannesburg

Human Science Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: clairebenit{at}hotmail.com.

	Abstract

In postapartheid South African cities, civil society’s loss of confidence in the ability of public authorities to protect citizens reflects the international trend toward the State’s delegation of a number of public functions. It has led to the proliferation of private and community initiatives which quickly spread across urban space, taking different forms according to the level of segregation, the shape of the urban fabric, the local culture of urban development and planning, the political context, and the pace of urban growth. This article, informed by the examples of Johannesburg and Cape Town, discusses the specific South African way of handling these delegation processes: a complex mix of neoliberal policies and practices and of the ANC’s agenda toward equality and redistribution for democratic South Africa. Indeed, after a transitional period where these initiatives were tolerated, public authorities are currently reasserting their power over some of these forms (community-led initiatives) while still encouraging public-private partnerships (CIDs).

First published on January 15, 2008, doi:10.1177/1078087407309223

Urban Affairs Review 2008;43:691.

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?