This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1078087409341036v1 45/2/147    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Edwards, M. M. Articles by Yu Xiao Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Annexation, Local Government Spending, and the Complicating Role of Density

University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Yu Xiao

Texas A&M University, College Station

Annexation is often touted as a strategy to improve the overall fiscal environment of a municipality. The empirical literature on the role of annexation in municipal finance, however, has yielded inconsistent results. This article examines annexation in nearly 1,000 municipalities for its effects on local government spending. Results show that spending is influenced by annexation, but the effects on spending are complicated by accompanying changes in municipal density levels. If annexation is accompanied by higher densities, the local government will certainly experience lower increases in per-capita spending levels. However, if annexation is accompanied by lower densities, the local government may or may not experience lower increases in per-capita spending levels, depending on changes in land area relative to changes in density.

Key Words: annexation • fiscal impacts • local government

This version was published on November 1, 2009

Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 45, No. 2, 147-165 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1078087409341036


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?