This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1078087408326900v1 44/5/645    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lay, J. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Race, Retrospective Voting, and Disasters

The Re-Election of C. Ray Nagin after Hurricane Katrina

Tulane University, New Orleans, LA

The 2006 New Orleans mayoral election provides a unique opportunity to examine the influence of a natural disaster on voting behavior. Theories of retrospective voting presume that voters will punish incumbents whose performance they deem unacceptable. To many Americans, Ray Nagin had done a poor job in handling Katrina. Theories of racial conflict and accommodation, however, contend that voters in urban elections base their choice primarily on racial group interests. This study shows that racial identity was a critical factor in vote choice. Although judgments of Nagin's performance were important, many voters placed greater responsibility on the federal government for the response.

Key Words: Hurricane Katrina • New Orleans • racial conflict • retrospective voting • disasters

This version was published on May 1, 2009

Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 44, No. 5, 645-662 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1078087408326900


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?