Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Theories of Urban Politics

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Urban Affairs Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fainstein, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cities and Diversity

Should We Want It? Can We Plan For It?

Susan S. Fainstein

Columbia University

Diversity has become the new orthodoxy of city planning. The term has several meanings: a varied physical design, mixes of uses, an expanded public realm, and multiple social grouping sexercising their "right to the city." Its impetus lies in the postmodernist/poststructuralist critique of modernism’s master narratives and more specifically in reactions to the urban landscape created by segregation, urban renewal, massive housing projects, and highway building programs. Privileging diversity raises significant issues. Can planned environments produce diversity or only a "staged authenticity"? Does emphasizing diversity obscure the economic structure? Is there a connection between diversity and economic innovation? Does social diversity necessarily contribute to equity and a broadly satisfying public realm? Rather than setting diversity as the principal goal of city planning, I argue for the model of the just city, based on Nussbaum’s concept of capacities and a recognition of the inevitable trade-offs among equity, diversity, growth, and sustainability.

Key Words: just city • urban planning • diversity • capacities

Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 41, No. 1, 3-19 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1078087405278968
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
A. Paolo Russo and A. A. Sans
Student Communities and Landscapes of Creativity: How Venice -- `The World's Most Touristed City' -- is Changing
European Urban and Regional Studies, April 1, 2009; 16(2): 161 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban StudHome page
L. Lees
Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance?
Urban Stud, November 1, 2008; 45(12): 2449 - 2470.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban StudHome page
A. M. Guest, C. E. Kubrin, and J. K. Cover
Heterogeneity and Harmony: Neighbouring Relationships among Whites in Ethnically Diverse Neighbourhoods in Seattle
Urban Stud, March 1, 2008; 45(3): 501 - 526.
[Abstract] [PDF]