Urban Affairs Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Musterd, S.
Right arrow Articles by Andersson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 40, No. 6, 761-790 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1078087405276006
© 2005 SAGE Publications

Housing Mix, Social Mix, and Social Opportunities

Sako Musterd

University of Amsterdam

Roger Andersson

Uppsala University

Will housing mix create social mix, and will social mix create social opportunity? This question is central in American and European urban debates. In Europe, however, there is a big gap between the political debates and actions regarding these issues and empirical research. In an effort to partly fill this gap, the authors critically evaluated the question above, applying a large-scale longitudinal Swedish data set covering the period 1991 to 1999 and available at the individual level for the entire population. The first part of the article reviews the various policies that are used in different European countries. The second part addresses the empirical analysis.

Key Words: longitudinal research • neighborhood effects • Sweden • housing policy • social mobility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
P. Smets and T. Salman
Countering Urban Segregation: Theoretical and Policy Innovations from around the Globe
Urban Stud, June 1, 2008; 45(7): 1307 - 1332.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
P. Smets and M. den Uyl
The Complex Role of Ethnicity in Urban Mixing: A Study of Two Deprived Neighbourhoods in Amsterdam
Urban Stud, June 1, 2008; 45(7): 1439 - 1460.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
S. Musterd
Residents' Views on Social Mix: Social Mix, Social Networks and Stigmatisation in Post-war Housing Estates in Europe
Urban Stud, April 1, 2008; 45(4): 897 - 915.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
L. Brannstrom
Making Their Mark: The Effects of Neighbourhood and Upper Secondary School on Educational Achievement
Eur. Sociol. Rev., March 10, 2008; (2008) jcn013v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
F. M. Pinkster
Localised Social Networks, Socialisation and Social Mobility in a Low-income Neighbourhood in the Netherlands
Urban Stud, December 1, 2007; 44(13): 2587 - 2603.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
S. Musterd
Segregation, Urban Space and the Resurgent City
Urban Stud, July 1, 2006; 43(8): 1325 - 1340.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
A. Brama
'White Flight'? The Production and Reproduction of Immigrant Concentration Areas in Swedish Cities, 1990-2000
Urban Stud, June 1, 2006; 43(7): 1127 - 1146.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
R. Andersson
'Breaking Segregation' Rhetorical Construct or Effective Policy? The Case of the Metropolitan Development Initiative in Sweden
Urban Stud, April 1, 2006; 43(4): 787 - 799.
[Abstract] [PDF]