Urban Affairs Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walls, M.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 40, No. 5, 590-613 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1078087404273342
© 2005 SAGE Publications

Private Markets, Contracts, and Government Provision

What Explains the Organization of Local Waste and Recycling Markets?

Margaret Walls

Molly Macauley

Resources for the Future

Soren Anderson

University of Michigan

The authors study determinants of market organization of local public services by an examination of one of the most visible services, residentialwaste management. Using a multinomial logit model and data for 1,000 U.S. communities, the authors explore the effects of political influence, voter ideology, environmental constraints, production costs, and contracting transaction costs on a community’s choice of service delivery options. They find that costs are significant in explaining communities’ choices. In contrast, few of the political variables are statistically significant. These results hold for both waste and recycling, providing further evidence that local governments emphasize costs when choosing between private and public provision.

Key Words: market organization • solid waste • recycling • local public goods


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?