Urban Affairs Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burns, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, M. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 39, No. 6, 791-812 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1078087404264918

Governors and the Development Regime in New Orleans

Peter F. Burns

Loyola University, New Orleans

Matthew O. Thomas

California State University, Chico

Regime theory argues that local actors shape city politics even though state government sets the rules under which urban players act. Regime theorists typically do not focus on conditions under which governors assume important roles in local regimes. The authors examine major economic development projects in New Orleans to highlight conditions under which extralocal actors, namely, governors, become involved in local regimes. A scarcity of both resources and business leaders in New Orleans, competition with other states, and political considerations motivated Louisiana governors to increase their participation in New Orleans’s urban development regime. Governors constituted part of the mobilization effort to move the city from a caretaker regime to a progrowth regime. They used their authority, fiscal resources, and leadership skills to assume this greater role. Gubernatorial participation in the regime benefited governors, New Orleans mayors, and major businesses at the expense of tourists, working-class and poor residents, the state legislature, and the state’s business reputation.

Key Words: economic development • regime theory • New Orleans


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
J. Krinsky
The Urban Politics of Workfare: New York City's Welfare Reforms and the Dimensions of Welfare Policy Making
Urban Affairs Review, July 1, 2007; 42(6): 771 - 798.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
P. Burns and M. O. Thomas
The Failure of the Nonregime: How Katrina Exposed New Orleans as a Regimeless City
Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 2006; 41(4): 517 - 527.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
C. N. Stone
Looking Back to Look Forward: Reflections on Urban Regime Analysis
Urban Affairs Review, January 1, 2005; 40(3): 309 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]