Urban Affairs Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Howard, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, 128-134 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/107808702401097835
© 2002 SAGE Publications

Chicago’s Uncertain Future since September 11, 2001

Dick Simpson

Ola Adeoye

Ruben Feliciano

Rick Howard

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago has suffered declines in the private sector and in government funding since September 11 while public safety costs have increased. Despite the impacts of September 11, Chicago politics and government have remained mostly unchanged, although the Chicago City Council has become more of a rubber-stamp council. Chicago’s future depends on success in preventing future terrorist attacks in the United States, on Chicago’s not being attacked, and on decisions by private firms to continue to locate and build in central cities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?