Urban Affairs Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Zadok, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gale, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 36, No. 6, 836-871 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/10780870122185118

Innovation and Reform, Intentional Inaction, and Tactical Breakdown

The Implementation Record of the Florida Concurrency Policy

Efraim Ben-Zadok

Florida Atlantic University

Dennis E. Gale

Rutgers University–Newark

This study evaluates the regulatory implementation process of the concurrency policy between 1985 and 2000. One of the main pillars of the 1985 Florida Growth Management Act, this policy is also a significant innovation in the growth management movement in the United States. Concurrency is a Florida statewide policy that requires local governments to provide public facilities needed to support development "concurrent" with the impacts of such projects. The study sheds light on different decision-making styles of state and local planning bureaucracies, including their relationships to legislative intentions. Concurrency began as a significant innovation and quickly lapsed into nondecision that was followed by both technical failures and adaptation efforts. In its most critical area, transportation concurrency, a tactical breakdown became evident. The implementation record of the policy shows mixed results.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
T. S. Chapin
Local Governments as Policy Entrepreneurs: Evaluating Florida's "Concurrency Experiment"
Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 2007; 42(4): 505 - 532.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
E. Ben-Zadok
Consistency, Concurrency and Compact Development: Three Faces of Growth Management Implementation in Florida
Urban Stud, November 1, 2005; 42(12): 2167 - 2190.
[Abstract] [PDF]