Urban Affairs Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mossberger, K.
Right arrow Articles by Stoker, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 36, No. 6, 810-835 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/10780870122185109

The Evolution of Urban Regime Theory

The Challenge of Conceptualization

Karen Mossberger

Kent State University

Gerry Stoker

University of Manchester

Urban regime theory came to prominence with the publication of Clarence Stone’s study of Atlanta in 1989, although earlier work by Fainstein and Fainstein (1983) and Elkin (1987) has also been influential. Since then, regime analysis has been extensively used to examine urban politics both inside North America and beyond. The authors argue that the wide use of regime analysis is a recognition of its value and insights but that some applications have stretched the concept beyond its original meaning to the point that the concept itself runs the risk of becoming meaningless and a source of theoretical confusion. By sifting through the extensive literature applying regime theory, the authors reestablish the core components of the concept and identify the key fields where it has made a contribution. It is suggested that regime analysis has helped considerably in reorienting the power debate in North America and in facilitating the analysis of politics beyond the formal institutions of the government outside North America.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
C. Poppelaars
Resource Exchange in Urban Governance: On the Means that Matter
Urban Affairs Review, September 1, 2007; 43(1): 3 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
J. Sapotichne, B. D. Jones, and M. Wolfe
Is Urban Politics a Black Hole? Analyzing the Boundary Between Political Science and Urban Politics
Urban Affairs Review, September 1, 2007; 43(1): 76 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
F. Moulaert, F. Martinelli, S. Gonzalez, and E. Swyngedouw
Introduction: Social Innovation and Governance in European Cities: Urban Development Between Path Dependency and Radical Innovation
European Urban and Regional Studies, July 1, 2007; 14(3): 195 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
J. Krinsky
The Urban Politics of Workfare: New York City's Welfare Reforms and the Dimensions of Welfare Policy Making
Urban Affairs Review, July 1, 2007; 42(6): 771 - 798.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational PolicyHome page
K. E. Bulkley
Bringing the Private Into the Public: Changing the Rules of the Game and New Regime Politics in Philadelphia Public Education
Educational Policy, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 155 - 184.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
J. Rast
Governing the Regimeless City: The Frank Zeidler Administration in Milwaukee, 1948-1960
Urban Affairs Review, September 1, 2006; 42(1): 81 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
P. Burns and M. O. Thomas
The Failure of the Nonregime: How Katrina Exposed New Orleans as a Regimeless City
Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 2006; 41(4): 517 - 527.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
B. Denters and K. Mossberger
Building Blocks for a Methodology for Comparative Urban Political Research
Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 2006; 41(4): 550 - 571.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
J. Pierre
Comparative Urban Governance: Uncovering Complex Causalities
Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 2005; 40(4): 446 - 462.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
A. M. Wood
Domesticating Urban Theory? US Concepts, British Cities and the Limits of Cross-national Applications
Urban Stud, October 1, 2004; 41(11): 2103 - 2118.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
S. Gissendanner
Mayors, Governance Coalitions, and Strategic Capacity: Drawing Lessons from Germany for Theories of Urban Governance
Urban Affairs Review, September 1, 2004; 40(1): 44 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
P. F. Burns and M. O. Thomas
Governors and the Development Regime in New Orleans
Urban Affairs Review, July 1, 2004; 39(6): 791 - 812.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
H. W. Kilburn
Explaining U.S. Urban Regimes: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Urban Affairs Review, May 1, 2004; 39(5): 633 - 651.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
H. Mommaas
Cultural Clusters and the Post-industrial City: Towards the Remapping of Urban Cultural Policy
Urban Stud, March 1, 2004; 41(3): 507 - 532.
[Abstract] [PDF]