Urban Affairs Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kantor, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 35, No. 6, 794-820 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/10780870022184688

Can Regionalism Save Poor Cities?

Politics, Institutions, and Interests in Glasgow

Paul Kantor

Fordham University

Regional governmental intervention is frequently advocated as a solution to the problems of poor cities. The regional reform model is examined in light of Glasgow’s experience. It suggests that this approach became a trap for Glasgow and contributed to the city’s spiral of decline. The findings indicate that the reform model is seriously flawed by economic determinism and ignores regional political dynamics. In particular, it conflates abstract notions of regional economic interdependence with policy prescriptions to aid cities, and it neglects powerful institutional political pressures that bias regional officials against equity considerations that might favor central cities. These forces are not likely to be peculiar only to Glasgow.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
D. L. Imbroscio
Shaming the Inside Game: A Critique of the Liberal Expansionist Approach to Addressing Urban Problems
Urban Affairs Review, November 1, 2006; 42(2): 224 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
P. Kantor
Regionalism and Reform: A Comparative Perspective on Dutch Urban Politics
Urban Affairs Review, July 1, 2006; 41(6): 800 - 829.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
H. V. Savitch and P. Kantor
Urban Strategies for a Global Era: A Cross-National Comparison
American Behavioral Scientist, April 1, 2003; 46(8): 1002 - 1033.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
J. I. Hodos
Globalization, Regionalism, and Urban Restructuring: The Case of Philadelphia
Urban Affairs Review, January 1, 2002; 37(3): 358 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]