Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Theories of Urban Politics

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Urban Affairs Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Win, Place, Show

Public Opinion Polls and Campaign Contributions in a New York City Election

Ester R. Fuchs

Barnard College and Columbia University

E. Scott Adler

University of Colorado, Boulder

Lincoln A. Mitchell

The Lapidus Group

The authors examine how the relative standing of candidates in public opinion polls during a primary campaign affects their ability to raise money. A theory is proposed that considers when individuals are most likely to contribute to the electoral campaigns of their most preferred candidate based on a rational model of political participation and concerns about a candidate’s likelihood of winning. The theory is then applied to the case of the 1989 New York City Democratic mayoral primary race. The data indicate that contributors are motivated to support candidates financially by the changing status of a candidate’s electoral prospects throughout the campaign.

Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, 479-501 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/10780870022184499


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Party PoliticsHome page
K. Eom and D. A. Gross
Democratization Effects of Campaign Contribution Limits in Gubernatorial Elections
Party Politics, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 695 - 720.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
K. Eom and D. A. Gross
Contribution Limits and Disparity in Contributions between Gubernatorial Candidates
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2006; 59(1): 99 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
T. B. Krebs and D. B. Holian
Media and Momentum: Strategic Contributing in a Big-City Mayoral Election
Urban Affairs Review, May 1, 2005; 40(5): 614 - 633.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
T. B. Krebs and J. P. Pelissero
Fund-Raising Coalitions in Mayoral Campaigns
Urban Affairs Review, September 1, 2001; 37(1): 67 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]