This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Saiz, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Mayoral Perceptions of Developmental and Redistributive Policies

A Cross-National Perspective

University of Notre Dame

The validity of Peterson’s policy typology, outlined in City Limits (1981), is dependent on the assumption that local government decision makers understand and order public policies in specific ways. Using confirmatory factor analysis of international survey data on mayoral public policy spending preferences from the Fiscal Austerity and Urban Innovation Project, the authors find that the categories of redistributive and developmental policies are more than creations of deductive reasoning. The spending preferences of mayors in selected industrial democracies conform to the structure and order as specified in Peterson’s theory.

Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 34, No. 6, 820-842 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/10780879922184220


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Liu and J. M. Vanderleeuw Economic Development Priorities and Central-City and Suburb Differences American Politics Research, November 1, 2004; 32(6): 698 - 721. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Basolo and C. Huang Cities and Economic Development: Does the City Limits Story Still Apply? Economic Development Quarterly, November 1, 2001; 15(4): 327 - 339. [Abstract] [PDF]