Urban Affairs Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wolman, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 32, No. 4, 558-582 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/107808749703200406

City-Suburban Income Disparities and Metropolitan Area Employment

Can Tightening Labor Markets Reduce the Gaps?

Edward W. Hill

Cleveland State University

Harold L. Wolman

Wayne State University

Were tight metropolitan labor markets in 1990 associated with narrow spatial income disparities between central cities and their suburbs? In U.S. national policy, it is assumed that maintaining high levels of national economic growth will attract inner-city poverty populations into the world of work, thereby reducing suburban-city income gaps. The authors examine the impact of tight labor markets on these disparities by developing regression models for metropolitan statistical areas. Economic growth, fostering tighter labor markets, is clearly desirable. However, tightening local labor markets actually exacerbates disparities to a point. Past that point disparities begin to decrease, but at a very slow rate.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
J. P. Blair and M. C. Carroll
Inner-City Neighborhoods and Metropolitan Development
Economic Development Quarterly, August 1, 2007; 21(3): 263 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
K. Mossberger, C. J. Tolbert, and M. Gilbert
Race, Place, and Information Technology
Urban Affairs Review, May 1, 2006; 41(5): 583 - 620.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
D. R. Morgan and P. Mareschal
Central-City/Suburban Inequality and Metropolitan Political Fragmentation
Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 1999; 34(4): 578 - 595.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
A. J. Mumphrey Jr. and K. M. Akundi
The Suburban Dependency Hypothesis, Reconsidered
Journal of Planning Literature, November 1, 1998; 13(2): 147 - 157.
[Abstract]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
D. Deka
Job Decentralization and Central-City Well-Being: An Empirical Study with Sectoral Data
Urban Affairs Review, November 1, 1998; 34(2): 263 - 290.
[Abstract]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
E. W. Hill, J. F. Brennan, and H. L. Wolman
What is a Central City in the United States? Applying a Statistical Technique for Developing Taxonomies
Urban Stud, November 1, 1998; 35(11): 1935 - 1969.
[Abstract] [PDF]