This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1078087408320240v1 44/2/266    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Dear, M. Articles by Dahmann, N. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Urban Politics and the Los Angeles School of Urbanism

¹ University of Southern California
² University of Southern California,

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mdear{at}usc.edu.

	Abstract

This polemical article uses Los Angeles as a template to challenge existing theoretical and empirical research traditions in the study of urban politics. The precepts of the "Los Angeles School" exemplify the shift from a modernist to a postmodern urbanism in which altered geographies are redefining the meaning and practice of urban politics. Los Angeles challenges an urban political scholarship that is overly focused on empirical analysis at the expense of theory, too constrained by conventional categories, and divorced from adjacent disciplines with much to contribute to the understanding of contemporary politics, including urban political economy.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?